Larry McVoy <l...@bitmover.com> writes:
>On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 12:48:49PM +0200, Adrian Robert wrote:>> Updates also use more bandwidth than a non-dVCS, since you have to>> get the history and logs for all intervening changes, instead of just>> the diff between you and latest.>>Again, I can't speak for fossil, but what you are saying is not true for>BitKeeper, it's very bandwidth sparing. We've had people use it over>modems just fine, including large projects like the Linux kernel.
Currently the initial clone for tcl from fossil is damn slow. At least
from core.tcl.tk. It is also not helped by failing to give you any idea
how far along it is (ie: 25% at 100Kbps or some such).
I've been given to understand its the network rather than the
software. Maybe true.
--
Pat Thoyts http://www.patthoyts.tk/
PGP fingerprint 2C 6E 98 07 2C 59 C8 97 10 CE 11 E6 04 E0 B9 DD
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the
growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses
are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software
be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker
today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar
_______________________________________________
Tcl-Core mailing list
Tcl-...@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tcl-core