On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 12:48:49PM +0200, Adrian Robert wrote:
> Updates also use more bandwidth than a non-dVCS, since you have to> get the history and logs for all intervening changes, instead of just> the diff between you and latest.
Again, I can't speak for fossil, but what you are saying is not true for
BitKeeper, it's very bandwidth sparing. We've had people use it over
modems just fine, including large projects like the Linux kernel.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitkeeper.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the
growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses
are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software
be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker
today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar
_______________________________________________
Tcl-Core mailing list
Tcl-...@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tcl-core