Re: generator/coroutine terminology

On 17/03/2015 03:18, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 at 8:37:25 AM UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:>>>>>> Ok Let me throw out a suggestion:>>>    - potato is a generator>>>    - tomato is a cursor.>>> Acceptable?>>>>>>> No.  In Python potato is a generator function, tomato is a generator.>> Why complicate something that is so simple?  I couldn't care less what>> they are called in any other language.>> Ok so lets see...> https://docs.python.org/3.4/tutorial/classes.html#generators> https://docs.python.org/3.4/glossary.html#term-generator>> Are these consistent with (your notion of) python?> Maybe they are "any other language"?>

I'll already suggested you write the patches and put them on the bug 
tracker.  If you can't be bothered please have the courtesy to stop 
bleating about it.

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list