j2ee and python and evil competitors

On Wednesday 10 July 2002 21:32, Steve Menard wrote:
> See, this is something I really don't understand. 
To fix this, please refer to the RFC standards and ISO numbers. As You see, no 
one for M$ Word.

> I will agree that PDF or> html would have been a better choice, 
Sure.

> but not everyone can generate PDF ya know. 
Are Your current OS is MS-DOS? Well, it easy cured by UNIX, AFAIK...
-----------8<---------
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
-----------8<---------
Oh... Sorry... DOS-*SHELL* AKA MS Windows...... So You should look at Adobe 
Distiler or ps2pdf or GhostScript or just visit http://freshmeat.net and 
search for PDF creation. Anyway, anybody can generate / export / create HTML.

> With this kind of attitude, we'll forever be regarded as the> extremists who won't listen to anything ....
No. No. No. Just FORWARD BACK to the sender the document you get from the net. 
This cures easily with procmail: just if attachment contains DOC, forward 
back to the sender with letter a'la: "Hi.\nIt would be nice get a PDF or HTML 
instead Microsoft DOC.\n\nThank You, much. Bye.\n<DATESTAMP/>\n". Steve, if 
somebody do wrong, *YOU* do right: create PDF or HTML instead of DOC.

P.S. In other hand there is no ISO for PDF... ;-)
P.P.S. Maybe UNIX world should enforce the rest folk to use OpenOffice or 
StarOffice by sending them SXW format?

-- 
Sincerely yours, Bogdan M. Maryniuck

Linux: Because a PC is a terrible thing to waste.
(By komarimf at craft.camp.clarkson.edu, Mark Komarinski)