Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 492: No new syntax is required

Hello,

On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 20:39:55 -0400
Yury Selivanov <ysel...@gmail.com> wrote:

[]

> > As for 3rd point, I'd like to remind that CPython is only one Python> > implementation. And with my MicroPython hat on, I'd like to know if> > (some of) these new features are "bloat" or "worthy" for the space> > constraints we have.> > OT: MicroPython is an amazing project. Kudos for doing it.> > I really hope that addition of few new magic methods won't> make it too hard for you guys to implement PEP 492 in> MicroPython one day.

Thanks! Damien George, MicroPython's author, actually already made a
basic implementation of async def/await:
https://github.com/micropython/micropython/commit/81afa7e098634605c04597d34a51ca2e59a87d7c
So we surely do hope this PEP will be accepted, and soonish! ;-)


-- 
Best regards,
 Paul                          mailto:pmis...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Pyth...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-dev-ml%40activestate.com