Re: pop @INC (".")

On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 02:09:55AM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 10 March 2012 01:25, Paul Johnson <p...@pjcj.net> wrote:> > > Yes, it's analogous to having "." in $PATH, and perhaps it's obvious to> > others, but I'd quite like to see some code showing why having "." in> > @INC is undesirable / unwise / dangerous / a security problem.> >> > Has the presence of "." in @INC caused problems, or is this a> > theoretical concern?> > I think a more useful thing to do, might be instead of completely> removing q{.} from @INC, would be replacing q{.} with a hook of sorts> that triggers when a file would otherwise be loaded from q{.} so you> can decide what to do with it.

It's possible.  But until we know exactly what problem we are solving
it's rather hard to say.

-- 
Paul Johnson - p...@pjcj.net
http://www.pjcj.net