"Jan Dubois" <j...@activestate.com> wrote
on Thu, 08 Mar 2012 16:54:36 PST:
> This is not about changing the default, just about providing the> option to do this, which is totally in the spirit of Perl.
Thanks, Jan. You're right that I misunderstood. That's less
disastrous then. I still think it's a bad idea, and I would
hate to see vendors springing such a config on people with
working programs that expect it to work.
I'd still rather people take the steps Abigail mentioned
if they are "worried" about it. Perl's had this for a
very very long time. I believe require showed up in perl3.
We can't compile programs, so we live with everything that ever
happened in the past. It's not like a change to the C compiler,
since that doesn't affecting running programs. Here anything we
do affects all programs, everywhere, everywhen. I've certainly
got programs that I haven't touched since perl3. There's still
no way to know who is relying on this. I don't want us blamed.
--tom