My approach to that common issue focuses on efficiency and elegant, declarative style of definition. That's why:
- The way switches work is based on unwrapped defaultdict/list lookup.
- The way you define switches is based on classes and easy-to-use decorators (note that you can use subclassing in a flexible way -- without any negative impact on efficiency!).
- Its use cases focus on a-lot-of-keys situations and it does not cover the fall-through feature (though you can reach its semantics if you really need that -- by calling class methods...).
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 | #!/usr/bin/env python
#
# Copyright (c) 2011 Jan Kaliszewski (zuo). All rights reserved.
# Licensed under the MIT License.
#
# Python 2.5+/3.x-compatibile.
#
# The newest version of this module should be downloadable from:
# https://github.com/zuo/Zuo-s-Recipes-and-Drafts/blob/master/caseswitch.py
from collections import defaultdict
import inspect
try: xrange
except NameError:
xrange = range # Py3.x
__all__ = 'with_switch', 'case', 'list_switch_factory', 'SwitchMeta', 'Switch'
#
# non-public stuff
class _DefaultCaseKey(object):
def __repr__(self):
return '<default>'
_DEF_CASE_KEY = _DefaultCaseKey()
# public classes and functions
def with_switch(cls):
"""
Class decorator that adds two attributes to the `cls` class:
* `switch` -- a defaultdict (or collection of other type, created with
cls.custom_switch_factory) mapping case keys to case objects (that
have been decorated with the @case() decorator;
* `get_default_case` -- a static method that returns the default case
object, i.e. one which has been decorated with @case(default=True)
(or returns None if no object has been decorated in that way).
Typically, case object is a callable method (but doesn't need to be).
"""
keys_to_cases = {}
for name, obj in inspect.getmembers(cls):
for key in getattr(obj, '_switch_case_keys', ()):
_obj = keys_to_cases.setdefault(key, obj)
if _obj is not obj:
raise ValueError('More than one case for key %r' % key)
default_case = keys_to_cases.pop(_DEF_CASE_KEY, None)
get_default_case = (lambda: default_case)
switch_factory = getattr(cls, 'custom_switch_factory', defaultdict)
kwargs = getattr(cls, 'custom_switch_factory_kwargs', {})
cls.switch = switch_factory(get_default_case, keys_to_cases, **kwargs)
cls.get_default_case = staticmethod(get_default_case)
return cls
def case(*keys, **kwargs):
"""Decorator: tags an attribute (probably a method) as a case object."""
keys = list(keys)
_default = kwargs.pop('default', False)
_itsname = kwargs.pop('itsname', False)
_classmethod = kwargs.pop('classmethod', False)
_staticmethod = kwargs.pop('staticmethod', True) # default option
if kwargs:
raise TypeError(
'case() got unexpected keyword arguments: %s' %
', '.join(sorted(kwargs)))
def case_decorator(obj):
if _default:
keys.append(_DEF_CASE_KEY)
if _itsname:
keys.append(obj.__name__)
obj._switch_case_keys = keys
if _classmethod:
return classmethod(obj)
elif _staticmethod:
return staticmethod(obj)
else:
return obj
return case_decorator
@staticmethod
def list_switch_factory(get_default_case, keys_to_cases, length=1000):
"""
Factory to create fast integer-only-based switches (using list-indexing).
A usefule example of the optional 'custom_switch_factory' attribute value.
"""
default_case = get_default_case()
switch = [keys_to_cases.pop(key, default_case) for key in xrange(length)]
if keys_to_cases:
raise ValueError(
'declared list length is too small for keys: ' +
', '.join(map(repr, sorted(keys_to_cases))))
return switch
#
# convenience classes (any of them can be used *optionally*
# -- instead of using @with_switch directly)
class SwitchMeta(type):
"""Metaclass: decorates classes created by it with @with_switch."""
def __new__(mcs, name, bases, attr_dict):
return with_switch(type.__new__(mcs, name, bases, attr_dict))
# (here: Py2.x/3.x-compatibile way to create a class with a custom metaclass)
Switch = SwitchMeta(
'Switch', (object,), {'__doc__':
"""SwitchMeta()-created class: decorates subclasses with @with_switch."""})
#
# some performance tests (with example switch declarations)...
if __name__ == '__main__':
import random
import sys
import timeit
# useful in most situations when the number of cases is not-so-small
# (for small numbers the traditional if/elif/else approach seems to be
# most efficient)
class DefaultDictSwitch(Switch):
@case(1)
def one(arg):
return 'one' + arg
@case(2)
def two(arg):
return 'two' + arg
@case(3)
def three(arg):
return 'three' + arg
@case(4)
def four(arg):
return 'four' + arg
@case(5)
def five(arg):
return 'five' + arg
@case(6)
def six(arg):
return 'six' + arg
@case(7)
def seven(arg):
return 'seven' + arg
@case(8)
def eight(arg):
return 'eight' + arg
@case(9)
def nine(arg):
return 'nine' + arg
@case(10)
def ten(arg):
return 'ten' + arg
@case(11)
def eleven(arg):
return 'eleven' + arg
@case(12)
def twelve(arg):
return 'twelve' + arg
@case(13)
def thirteen(arg):
return 'thirteen' + arg
@case(14)
def fourteen(arg):
return 'fourteen' + arg
@case(15)
def fifteen(arg):
return 'fifteen' + arg
@case(16)
def sixteen(arg):
return 'sixteen' + arg
@case(17, 71, 77)
def seventeen_plus(arg):
return 'seventeen_plus' + arg
@case(18, 81, 88, 111, 118, 181, 188, 811, 818, 881, 888)
def eighteen_plus(arg):
return 'eighteen_plus' + arg
@case(
19, 91, 99, 119, 191, 199, 911, 919, 991, 999,
1111, 1119, 1191, 1199, 1911, 1919, 1991, 1999,
9111, 9119, 9191, 9199, 9911, 9919, 9991, 9999)
def nineteen_plus(arg):
return 'nineteen_plus' + arg
@case(33, 333, 3333, default=True)
def something_else(arg):
return 'the default case' + arg
# we add some cases, basing on an already defined switch class
# (note that subclassing does not slow down the switch at all!)
class AdminCommandSwitch(DefaultDictSwitch):
@case(itsname=True) # @case('shutdown') expressed in a DRY way
def shutdown():
return 'shutdown'
@case('get-class', classmethod=True)
def get_class(cls):
return cls
@case(*xrange(30000, 40000))
def many_keys():
return 'many_keys'
# special-case optimization (for integer-only keys from a limited range)
class ListBasedSwitch(DefaultDictSwitch):
custom_switch_factory = list_switch_factory
custom_switch_factory_kwargs = {'length': 10000}
# no real advantages over DefaultDictSwitch (added here only to show that)
class DictBasedSwitch(DefaultDictSwitch):
custom_switch_factory = staticmethod(
lambda get_default_case, keys_to_cases: dict(keys_to_cases))
def test_standard():
"standard switch (out-of-the-box default case support)"
switch = DefaultDictSwitch.switch
x = ''
for key in case_keys:
x = switch[key](x[:10])
def test_standard2():
"another standard switch -- subclass with more cases"
switch = AdminCommandSwitch.switch
x = ''
for key in case_keys:
x = switch[key](x[:10])
assert switch['shutdown']() == 'shutdown'
assert switch['get-class']() is AdminCommandSwitch
assert switch[34567]() == 'many_keys'
def test_list_based_range_default():
"list-based switch (default case support for keys from the range)"
switch = ListBasedSwitch.switch
x = ''
for key in case_keys:
x = switch[key](x[:10])
def test_list_based_with_try_except():
"list-based switch + additional try/except-based default case support"
switch = ListBasedSwitch.switch
default_case = ListBasedSwitch.get_default_case()
_error = IndexError
x = ''
for key in case_keys:
try:
x = switch[key](x[:10])
except _error:
x = default_case(x[:10])
def test_dict_based_no_default():
"ordinary-dict-based switch, no default case support"
switch = DictBasedSwitch.switch
x = ''
for key in case_keys:
x = switch[key](x[:10])
def test_dict_based_with_get():
"ordinary-dict-based switch + dict.get()-based default case support"
switch = DictBasedSwitch.switch
default_case = DictBasedSwitch.get_default_case()
x = ''
for key in case_keys:
x = switch.get(key, default_case)(x[:10])
def test_dict_based_with_try_except():
"ordinary-dict-based switch + try/except-based default case support"
switch = DictBasedSwitch.switch
default_case = DictBasedSwitch.get_default_case()
_error = KeyError
x = ''
for key in case_keys:
try:
x = switch[key](x[:10])
except _error:
x = default_case(x[:10])
def test_if_elif():
"traditional if/elif.../else sequence"
x = ''
for key in case_keys:
if key == 1:
x = 'one' + x[:10]
elif key == 2:
x = 'two' + x[:10]
elif key == 3:
x = 'three' + x[:10]
elif key == 4:
x = 'four' + x[:10]
elif key == 5:
x = 'five' + x[:10]
elif key == 6:
x = 'six' + x[:10]
elif key == 7:
x = 'seven' + x[:10]
elif key == 8:
x = 'eight' + x[:10]
elif key == 9:
x = 'nine' + x[:10]
elif key == 10:
x = 'ten' + x[:10]
elif key == 11:
x = 'eleven' + x[:10]
elif key == 12:
x = 'twelve' + x[:10]
elif key == 13:
x = 'thirteen' + x[:10]
elif key == 14:
x = 'fourteen' + x[:10]
elif key == 15:
x = 'fifteen' + x[:10]
elif key == 16:
x = 'sixteen' + x[:10]
elif key in (17, 71, 77):
x = 'seventeen_plus' + x[:10]
elif key in (18, 81, 88, 111, 118, 181, 188, 811, 818, 881, 888):
x = 'eighteen_plus' + x[:10]
elif key in (
19, 91, 99, 111, 119, 191, 199, 911, 919, 991, 999,
1111, 1119, 1191, 1199, 1911, 1919, 1991, 1999):
x = 'nineteen_plus' + x[:10]
else:
x = 'the default case' + x[:10]
def test_tour(test_seq, msg, case_keys_choice, case_keys_length=1000000):
global case_keys
case_keys_choice = sorted(case_keys_choice)
print(
'\ngenerating random-ordered, %d-item-long, '
'sequence of keys from the set: {%s}...' %
(case_keys_length, ', '.join(map(repr, case_keys_choice))))
case_keys = [
random.choice(case_keys_choice) for i in xrange(case_keys_length)]
print('\n' + msg)
fastest_tests = []
for test in test_seq:
try:
results = timeit.Timer(
'test()',
'from __main__ import %s as test' % test.__name__,
).repeat(number=1, repeat=3)
except Exception:
print('* %s: [could not be used]' % test.__doc__)
else:
fastest = min(results)
print('* %s: %s (fastest: %f)' % (
test.__doc__,
', '.join('%f' % t for t in results),
fastest))
fastest_tests.append((fastest, test.__doc__))
if fastest_tests:
print('\nthe winner is: %f/%s' % (min(fastest_tests)))
print('%r simple performance tests' % sys.argv[0])
test_seq = (
test_if_elif,
test_standard,
test_standard2,
test_list_based_range_default,
test_list_based_with_try_except,
test_dict_based_no_default,
test_dict_based_with_get,
test_dict_based_with_try_except,
)
test_tour(
test_seq,
'test tour #1 (default cases not used; small number of keys):',
case_keys_choice = tuple(xrange(1, 10)))
test_tour(
test_seq,
'test tour #2 (default cases not used; not-so-small number of keys):',
case_keys_choice = (tuple(xrange(1, 20)) + (
71, 77, 18, 81, 88, 111, 118, 181, 188, 811, 818, 881, 888,
91, 99, 119, 191, 199, 911, 919, 991, 999,
1111, 1119, 1191, 1199, 1911, 1919, 1991, 1999,
9111, 9119, 9191, 9199, 9911, 9919, 9991, 9999)))
test_tour(
test_seq,
'test tour #3 (using default cases, keys in list-based switch range):',
# about half of the keys do not have their cases (default case is used)
case_keys_choice = (tuple(xrange(1, 70)) + (
71, 77, 18, 81, 88, 111, 118, 181, 188, 811, 818, 881, 888,
91, 99, 119, 191, 199, 911, 919, 991, 999,
1111, 1119, 1191, 1199, 1911, 1919, 1991, 1999,
9111, 9119, 9191, 9199, 9911, 9919, 9991, 9999)))
test_tour(
test_seq,
'test tour #4 (using default cases, their keys not in that range):',
# about half of the keys do not have their cases (default case is used)
# + that keys are not in the list-based switch key range
case_keys_choice=(tuple(xrange(1, 20)) + (
71, 77, 18, 81, 88, 111, 118, 181, 188, 811, 818, 881, 888,
91, 99, 119, 191, 199, 911, 919, 991, 999,
1111, 1119, 1191, 1199, 1911, 1919, 1991, 1999,
9111, 9119, 9191, 9199, 9911, 9919, 9991, 9999) +
tuple(xrange(10000, 10050))))
|
Please, see the source + run the performance tests...