Cameron Laird wrote:
> Forth. Lisp. Tcl.
I was thinking of even less than that. Just define a few flow control
things and get everything out of the objects. I expect it would look
either like lisp or smalltalk.
There would only be one built in datatype, the message, and all the
objects would chuck messages around. Thus the language as such would
have a very limited syntax.
x = new Object;
s = new Stream;
So we have declare variables, load classes and pass messages.