David MacQuigg wrote, amongst other things:
> > If you believe as I do that Python is not yet the ultimate language,
If Python were the ultimate language, it would be a Lisp ;-)
> and some syntactical changes are still to come, then it seems like> using a very distinct symbol like @ may have some merits. This is not
Perhaps, but as it stands, Python syntax is the best compromise in
readability I have seen in any programming language, and I for one am
very comfortable with less cryptic symbols - another case for explicit
is better than implicit.