| Store | Cart

OT(Slightly): Thanks to Python.

From: David M. Wilson <dw-g...@botanicus.net>
10 Mar 2004 12:34:31 -0800 
"David M. Cook" <davecook at nowhere.net> wrote...

> Python lacks access controls (private/protected etc), though you can use __> name munging.

In an entirely speculative tone, is this correct? I thought new-style
objects supported protected attributes and such via properties. This
might be completely incorrect, my head has been like a sieve for the
last few months. :(


David.
Recent Messages in this Thread
OT(Slightly): Thanks to Python.
 Aahz Mar 10, 2004 10:48 pm
OT(Slightly): Thanks to Python.
 Bob Ippolito Mar 04, 2004 11:51 pm
OT(Slightly): Thanks to Python.
 David M. Cook Mar 05, 2004 06:32 am
 
OT(Slightly): Thanks to Python.
 David M. Wilson Mar 10, 2004 08:34 pm
OT(Slightly): Thanks to Python.
 Michael Hudson Mar 04, 2004 07:40 pm
OT(Slightly): Thanks to Python.
 Christopher Koppler Mar 05, 2004 09:03 am
OT(Slightly): Thanks to Python.
 Jacek Generowicz Mar 05, 2004 09:43 am
 
OT(Slightly): Thanks to Python.
 JanC Mar 05, 2004 05:16 pm
 
 
OT(Slightly): Thanks to Python.
 Jacek Generowicz Mar 08, 2004 09:24 am
 
 
 
OT(Slightly): Thanks to Python.
 JanC Mar 09, 2004 09:25 pm
 
 
 
 
OT(Slightly): Thanks to Python.
 Michael Hudson Mar 10, 2004 11:47 am
 
 
 
 
OT(Slightly): Thanks to Python.
 Jacek Generowicz Mar 10, 2004 03:03 pm
 
 
 
 
 
OT(Slightly): Thanks to Python.
 JanC Mar 13, 2004 05:24 am
 
 
 
 
 
 
OT(Slightly): Thanks to Python.
 Josiah Carlson Mar 13, 2004 07:17 am
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OT(Slightly): Thanks to Python.
 Ville Vainio Mar 13, 2004 09:08 am
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PEP 318 (wrappers), multimethods, strict typechecking (was Re: OT(Slightly): ...
 Ville Vainio Mar 13, 2004 09:17 am
◄ Messages in this thread ►

Next post: Graphics.