Fran?ois Pinard wrote:
[...snip...]
> I do not think so. SGML already has these virtues, and much > more than XML.> The main goal of XML was to please machines, because full SGML is so> difficult to parse. The price to pay to please machines was a loss of> readability for humans. XML is so verbose that real information gets> overwhelmed under tags. The fish often gets drawn in practice.
[..snip...]
I think you should substitute "software writers" for "machines". A full SGML parser, which must always be validating, is indeed very hard to write (I only know of two that really meet the spec), but an XML parser, particulatly a well-formdness only parser, is much easier to write.
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service.