On 22 July 2015 at 04:08, Brett Cannon <bre...@python.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:05 AM Carol Willing> <will...@willingconsulting.com> wrote:>> The Communications Quick Start section would be brief and practical much>> like the Quick Start section for downloading and testing the source>> code. Placing the Communications Quick Start section before the existing>> Quick Start section would emphasize the importance that productive>> communications has on CPython development.>>> Sounds great to me! Social norms are just as important to get to speed on as> technical requirements when contributing to an open source community, so> this seems like a worthy project.
+1 from me as well. The discussion of a more formal CoC on the
python-committers list also highlighted for me that our main current
problems don't appear to be with any ill-intent on anyone's part, but
rather with well-intentioned messages that nevertheless have the
effect of causing folks to feel unappreciated and resentful. A
practical quick start guide is likely to be more effective in
addressing that aspect than a more explicit CoC (although I still
think the latter would be a good idea in the long run).
Nick Coghlan | ncog...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
Python-Dev mailing list