Am 26.09.18 um 15:24 schrieb Donal K. Fellows:
> I'm still trying to understand why this should be wedged through photo > images.
It shouldn't. It just was the easiest thing to do when I implemented the
original version. Because then the photo handler takes care of the
rendering by itself.
> If it was its own full image type, it would have a lot more > options when it comes to rendering and the image handle command would be > open to customization to provide far more information and whatever other > operations make sense.
'xactly. For the first draft, this could do whatever the photo handler
does at the moment, i.e. blitting the pre-rendered image onto the
screen. The hard part is to convince Rene that this is th ebetter
solution (more future-proof) than the image format handler.
> Though the SVG implementation should still be > described via tk::pkgconfig; that's exactly the right place for that > kind of detail.
+1.
Auriocus
_______________________________________________
Tcl-Core mailing list
Tcl-...@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tcl-core