| Store | Cart

Re: [TCLCORE] Re: TIP#181: Add a [namespace unknown] Command

From: <d...@nist.gov>
Fri, 1 Jul 2005 00:08:20 -0400
Donald G Porter wrote:
> > I haven't thought enough about it, but your examples feel to me more> > like use cases for the enhanced execution traces I believe Jeff Hobbs> > has hinted about proposing.  

Thought about it a little more and I'm wrong on that point.

The extended execution traces would, I believe, still attach
to the execution of a particular command.  The features Neil
described are attached specifically to the "unknown command"
situation.  Execution traces cannot substitute for them.
Sorry to have pointed in the wrong direction on that point.

That shifts us back to just a difference of opinion on which
handler should have responsibility in which situation.  Neil's
clearly thought about it longer and in more detail than I have.
I need to reread and review his reasoning.


SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
Tcl-Core mailing list

Recent Messages in this Thread
Donald G Porter Jun 30, 2005 08:33 pm
Donal K. Fellows Jun 30, 2005 09:49 pm
Neil Madden Jul 01, 2005 01:28 am
d...@nist.gov Jul 01, 2005 04:08 am
Messages in this thread