Re: [Python-Dev] provisional status for asyncio

On 30 August 2015 at 05:16, Yury Selivanov <ysel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since there is at least some possibility that we might have another> discussion about asyncio removal from the stdlib in 3.6, should I> just reuse the warning we had in 3.4 for asyncio:>>>     Note: The asyncio package has been included in the>     standard library on a provisional basis. Backwards>     incompatible changes (up to and including removal>     of the module) may occur if deemed necessary by the>     core developers.>> ?

I don't see much chance of us actually removing it - the most I see us
doing is potentially shifting to a "bundled 3rd party library" update
model if there's still a high churn rate in the API after another
release cycle.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncog...@gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Pyth...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-dev-ml%40activestate.com