Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 485 review (isclose())

Thank you Guido.

It'll be nice to see this all come to something.

Thanks to all who contributed to the discussion -- despite this being a
pretty simple function, I learned a lot and far more fully appreciate the
nuance of all of this.

I'll edit the text as you suggest, and then work on a patch -- I'm sure
I'll have questions for Python-dev when I actually do that, but I'll get
started on my  own and see how far I get.

-Chris





On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Guido van Rossum <gui...@python.org> wrote:

> I think it's time to accept PEP 485. I've re-read it once more, and it> looks like the text is in great shape. (My only recommendation would be to> update the Abstract to state that we're specifically adding math.isclose().)>> A wording question: "This implementation has a flag that lets the user> select which relative tolerance test to apply -- this PEP does not suggest> that that be retained, but rather than the weak test be selected." -- I> think this was meant to say "... rather *that* the weak test be selected",> right? (It would be nice if the sample implementation defaulted to the> choice in the PEP.)>> However, those are just minor edits, and I hereby approve the PEP. Thanks> Chris and everyone else for the fruitful discussion (and thanks especially> to Chris for eventually ending the bikeshedding and writing a PEP that> explains each of the choices). Congrats!>> --> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)>



-- 

Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer

Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R            (206) 526-6959   voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE   (206) 526-6329   fax
Seattle, WA  98115       (206) 526-6317   main reception

Chri...@noaa.gov