Re: [Python-Dev] [PEP466] SSLSockets, and sockets, _socketobjects oh my!

Le 22/07/2014 17:44, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
>>  >>  > As for 2.x, I don't see why you couldn't just continue using a strong> reference.>> As Antoine says, if the cycle already exists in Python 2 (and it sounds> like it does), we can just skip backporting the weak reference change.
No, IIRC there shouldn't be a cycle. It's just complicated in a 
different way than 3.x :-)

Regards

Antoine.


_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Pyth...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-dev-ml%40activestate.com