>>>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 20:45:28 -0500, Ricardo Signes <perl...@rjbs.manxome.org> said:> Wait, what? Blocker review? Doesn't this usually get put off until much> later?> Well, look, if we're not going to be making any user-visible changes, we might> as well start trying to close all the known blockers ASAP. Maybe we can land> this release a little earlier than last year, instead of a little later!> That'd be nice.> So, I'm going to start our blocker review *now*, and I'm going to start it with> this remark:> *** If you know of an open ticket that should be a blocker, say so now, and> *** if you know of a ticketless issue that should be a blocker ticket, make> *** it now!> * BBC: Algorithm-Permute> https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127475> I think this is actually fixed.
Even if the thing in the headline is fixed, you find a couple of
blockers in
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2016/01/msg233698.html
mentioned in the section "prior discussion". If the blockers there have
found their way into your list, please ignore me. I just want to make
sure, they are not overlooked.
--
andreas