Re: Regexp Non-capturing flag proposal

Matthew Horsfall wrote:
>   http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/shortlog/refs/heads/alh/regex_nocapture> > Please take a look when you get a chance.

I don't see anything wrong with the patch.  But I *thought* the pro-
posed flag would also prevent $` $& $' from being set, but now I real-
ise I simply imagined that.  Would it make sense to include that?  Or
does /(?n)/ render that infeasible?  Or would it just be confusing?