On 18 September 2014 09:56, Abigail <abig...@abigail.be> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 08:26:01AM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:>>>> Yes, the problem has occurred again with 5.18.3-RC1 because it's>> sticking to the old-style numbering scheme (in fact, an even older>> style than 5.20.1 used!), but as with the final release of 5.20.1, the>> problem will disappear with a new CPAN release immediately following>> the final release of 5.18.3, and longer term (5.22 onwards) the>> problem will go away with the new 5.YYYYMMDD numbering scheme.>>> Will a 5.YYYYMMDD scheme prevent us from doing a maint and a dev release> on the same day?>
No, but I think other logistical / will-power factors will ;-)